But in fact the dog does have a place in history, which in why LIFE featured this grumpy-looking fellow its Feb. 28, 1955 issue. Fearnought had just won the Westminster Kennel Club dog show, which was a rarity for a bulldog.
Here’s what LIFE said about the result:
With his whiskers properly clipped and his nose vaselined to bring out the highlights, an English-born bulldog, Ch. Kippax Fearnought, won U.S. dogdom’s top laurels, the best in show award of the Westminster Kennel Club’s show in New York’s Madison Square Garden. First in his breed to win the award since 1913 and only the second to win the award since it was established in 1907, Fearnought was brought to the U.S. 14 months ago by Dr. J.A. Saylor of Long Beach, Calif., who bought him after seeing his picture in a magazine.
In the years since these photos were taken, Fearnought’s place in history has only become more precious, because since 1955 show no other bulldog has joined him on the Best in Show list.
But all talk of prizes aside, it’s these looks that are winning. If you can’t get enough of them, check out this Facebook group dedicated to Grumpy English Bulldogs.
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
George Silk/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Kippax Fearnought, here going through his grooming routine in 1955, is the last bulldog to win Best in Show at the Westminster competition.
HAPPY CHILDREN ARE all alike, the sage might have counseled; each unhappy child is unhappy in his or her own way. A preponderance of enduring children’s stories, those with the fiber to last, say, a century or more, are marked by an unhappiness of one kind or another: an absent parent, an evil stepmother, poverty, unfairness, persecution. Witches lurk, giants snarl, spells are cast, and people die. Childhood in Winnie-the-Pooh? That’s a world driven by daydreams and idle moments, by fine ideas, generosity, and pleasure in small things. What was Pooh up to one morning? “Well, he was humming this hum to himself and walking along gaily, wondering what everybody else was doing, and what it felt like, being someone else. . . .”
Good feelings bloom throughout the Hundred Acre Wood, feelings of comfort and ease and the possibility of a happy surprise. Problems don’t turn out to be such serious problems after all. Potential crises never quite materialize. Nothing really seems that bad. When we first meet Pooh, Christopher Robin has him by one arm and is haphazardly dragging him down a flight of stairs, the stuffed bear’s head knocking—“bump, bump, bump”—on each step. Pooh proves unbothered. “It is, as far as he knows, the only way of coming downstairs. . . . ”
When a small worry does arise for Pooh, it can usually be placated by a taste of condensed milk or a lick of honey. You’re able to take life as it comes when you’re bound to a core belief that things are going to turn out all right. Above all, in the pages of the Winnie-the-Pooh books, there’s an overriding sense—the threat of running into a Heffalump notwithstanding—of being protected and safe. Is there a child of any age, 2 to 102, who doesn’t want that?
*
My daughter Maya started at the local dance studio at an age when the classes served in essence as a form of one-hour babysitting. By the time she was 6, she took part in her third annual spring recital, on stage in the high school auditorium. As ever, the extended family turned out. “You know, the first couple of years, you weren’t much good at this.” Maya’s grandmother, my mom, was blunt in the post-show assessment. “But this year, you really looked great up there! What happened?”
Maya considered this for a moment. “The truth is,” she then said, “for a long time, when I was younger in dance class, I didn’t really understand what was going on. But this year, I suddenly did! Now I do!”
Such epiphanies are common in childhood, inevitable markers for the developing brain and the continuing apprehension of the wider world. Pooh and his friends are not 6 (until, finally they are), and the capers they embark upon, or get thrust into, manage to be at once purposeful and desultory. They have a mind to do something they’ve dreamt up or heard about, but they aren’t quite sure how to go about doing it. It’s a bit like following along in a dance class when you don’t really understand what’s going on. Pooh is a bear who may one day spend his time earnestly tracking the footprints of a Woozle only to gradually realize that the footprints are in fact his own. He’s also a bear who sizes up the situation and the available assets and then thinks to use an upturned umbrella as a ship to float across the flooded forest floor and rescue Piglet. (Not all endeavors go so well. This is a good time to warn Pooh readers against trying to float up to inspect a live beehive by holding onto a balloon.)
Pooh and Christopher Robin are proud of Pooh’s stroke of umbrella genius, just as they are proud when, after they’ve set out to find the North Pole, Pooh indeed finds it, in the Wood. The sign that Christopher Robin ties to that pole as he plants it upright in the forest floor—
NORTH POLE
DISCOVERED BY POOH
POOH FOUND IT
—is his version of a parent sticking their child’s fingerpainting on the door of the fridge. A buoyant Pooh, after a consult with Christopher Robin, soon sets out to find the East Pole as well.
*
In the summer of 2025, a meme emerged across social platforms featuring Jim Cummings, who has been the voice of Winnie-the-Pooh since 1988. Cummings is now 72, and, in the meme, he holds his infant grandson on his lap. In a soft, faintly husky tone—Poohlike, to be sure—Cummings says to the baby: “You’re braver than you believe, smarter than you seem, and stronger than you think. And cute as a button.”
It’s an adaptation of a line delivered by Christopher Robin in the 1997 movie Pooh’s Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin. When Christopher Robin says it in the movie, he does so as part of an attempt to brace Pooh for what the future may bring. “Pooh bear,” Christopher Robin begins. They are playing together on the branches of a tree, and evening has set in. “What if, someday, there came a tomorrow when we were apart?”
The notion is so alien to Pooh (you try imagining a tomorrow when oxygen has been entirely removed from the atmosphere) that he can’t comprehend it. “As long as we’re apart together, we shall certainly be fine,” Pooh says.
Christopher Robin giggles but presses on. “Yes, yes, of course. But if we weren’t together. . . . If I were somewhere else?”
The scene moves along, with Pooh catching fireflies in the waning light, and leads to the braver/smarter/stronger adage. But the point has now been made. Tomorrow will come. It turns out that within all the comfort and warmth, there is indeed a dagger of cruel truth beneath the surface in Winnie-the-Pooh, the same cruel truth that finally undoes every happy childhood: It ends. ▪
A.A. Milne with his son, Christopher Robin, and the stuffed bear Christopher Robin originally called Edward. The early Winnie-the-Pooh short stories were based on tales Milne made up to entertain Christopher Robin.
Getty Images
E. H. Shepard, here in 1976, was a prolific painter before he turned to illustration. He modeled his drawing of Winnie-the-Pooh after his own son’s bear, called Growler.
Getty Images
Christopher Robin and Pooh had each other’s back in this illustration from A.A. Milne’s first Winnie-the-Pooh book, which came out in 1926.
Pooh, Piglet and Christopher Robin from A.A. Milne’s 1926 “Winnie-the-Pooh,” the first illustrated book with these characters.
ZUMAPRESS.com
Pooh met Tigger in Milne’s second collection of Winnie-the-Pooh stories. The illustration is by E.H. Sheppard.
ZUMAPRESS.com
Pooh and Piglet in A.A. Milne’s 1926 collection The House on Pooh Corner.
ZUMAPRESS.com
Ernest Shepard in 1969 (opposite). In addition to the Pooh books, he illustrated children’s classics such as The Wind in the Wilows and The Secret Garden.
David Montgomery/Getty Images
This 2009 novel picked up where the Milne stories left off.
AFP via Getty Images
This rare Winnie-the-Pooh book featured an inscription from author A.A. Milne asking for artist E.H. Shephard to decorate his tomb.
Choosing shoes that go with your outfit is the subject of many online tutorials. In 1946, some clothes makers experimented with a novel approach to simplify the challenge. They sold shoes and dresses that were literally cut from the same cloth.
The newest looking shoes this year are made of bright fabrics. For shoemakers this is a risky innovation because gay shoes make a girl’s feet look bigger than they are, and the American girls’ feet are big enough already (most sold size, 7 1/2). But using fabrics makes it possible to turn out novel shoes which match other parts of an outfit. Besides, as shoemakers realize, bold shoes are a fine device for attracting attention to pretty legs.
The trend didn’t last, but it did serve as the inspiration for some eye-catching photos from LIFE staff photographer Nina Leen, an expert on making fashions jump off the page.
LIFE noted that manufacturers had been forced to make fabric shoes during World War II because of rationing that limited the supplies of leather (and also rubber). But during those war years manufacturers used dark-colored cloth so as not to draw attention to it. In 1946 some manufacturers switched gears and decided to the highlight the presence of cloth by using bright patterned fabric. LIFE said that this approach gave outfits a “startling footnote.”
P.S Speaking of footnotes, the 1946 story’s comment about the size of women’s feet is not only odd but also outdated. These days women’s feet are actually much bigger, with the average size now up to 8 1/2. The most likely explanation: changes in the American diet.
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From a 1946 story on shoes and outfits made from the same fabric.
The assignment for Dmitri Kessel was a straightforward one: capture images of Italy getting back to normal after World War II. His photos were part of a larger package showing how the Marshall Plan was helping to rebuild Europe.
LIFE wrote in its 1948 report that, after the brutal war years, Europe was seeing a revival:
From the tip of Italy north to Scapa Flow, American travelers are discovering a surprising new look on the war-scarred face of Western Europe. Buildings are going up, the railroads are running, there is more food and the trade is brisk. In many small Italian villages newly painted homes gleam amidst the old colors of yellow terra cotta…. To Americans, who for a decade have only heard reports of European misery, all this comes as a pleasant shock.
To document this moment of change, Kessel took photos of people enjoying a beach that had been previously unusable because it had been planted with land mines. He showed men working at an Alfa Romeo factory in Milan that had been bombed in 1944, but was nearing its old production levels. Kessel also showed tourists from India and the United States visiting attractions that draw people the world over.
Kessel was not the first LIFE photographer to undertake an assignment like this. The year before, in 1947, Alfred Eisenstadt had also gone to Italy to survey the country’s post-war progress and come home with his own collection of amazing images.
While the scars of World War II were still fresh—one of Kessel’s photos shows workers rebuilding a bridge that had been taken out during the fighting—the country remained photogenic. It’s why LIFE photographers—and tourists (including 60 million in 2024)—keep making Italy one of the most visited countries in the world.
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
This Italian beach, which had been planted with landmines during World War II, was now safe for public use, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
People danced on the terrace of an Italian beach as the country began to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A man and woman conversed at an Italian beach, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
People in Rome sunbathed and swawm at the Tiber boathouse, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Men played checkers by the water in Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Children played cards on the street in Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
People harvested grain in Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A team of four oxen pulled a harvester over an oat field in Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Factory workers in Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Alfa Romeo plant in Milan, Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Alfa Romeo plant in Milan, Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Two newly assembled Alfa Romeos were checked over at the company factory in Milan, Italy, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
American sightseers at St. Peter’s in Rome, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Tourists posed at the Colosseum in Rome, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Scenes around Italy from a story about the country starting to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Workers reconstructed a bridge over the Po River as Italy began to bounce back from World War II, 1948.
Dmitri Kessel/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
America has a lot going for it, and the ability to feed itself would be at the top of the list. The country is rich in arable farmland.
This important truth is one that suffuses this collection of harvest-time photos taken during LIFE’s original run from 1936 to 1972. The crops being harvested in these photos include corn, wheat, potatoes, tomatoes, onions, celery, grapes, peaches, squash and watermelon. It’s a veritable cornucopia.
It’s worth noting that much has changed about America’s farms since these photos were taken, with the family farm giving way to large-scale agribusiness. According to data from the U.S Department of Agriculture, the number of farms in the United States reached their peak in 1935, at around 7 million. Then came a period of rapid decline, with the total hitting 2 million by the 1970s before leveling off some. The total acreage of farmland didn’t change that much, though, because while the number of farms decreased, their size multiplied.
LIFE was very much aware of this change as it was happening, and worried that it was bad for the country. The magazine fretted in 1948 that the decline of the family farm might also signal the decline of the American family, as families stopped focussing on joint enterprises and its members pursued their individual interests instead. Some of the warmest and most nostalgic images in this collection are those of community, showing people working in unison or taking a break to enjoy a communal meal—with members of a found family, if not an actual one.
Not much is known about the particular farms or farmers in most of these images, though some of the photos, by Michael Rougier, were taken for a story about migrant workers. In all cases, through, there is a connection to the land, and reminder of what it takes for Americans to get their fruits and vegetables.
Harvesters hitchhiked to a wheat harvesting, Oklahoma, 1942.
For a few weeks in 1963, Americans could see the Mona Lisa without having to go to the Louvre.
That’s because the Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece crossed the Atlantic ocean by boat for a one-of-a-kind visit to the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. This was the only time the painting came to the Americas, and likely the only time it ever will. The only other occasions on which the Mona Lisa has left France were in 1911, when it was stolen by an Italian museum worker and briefly taken to Italy, and in 1974, when the painting traveled for exhibitions in Japan and Russia.
How did the U.S. visit even come about? Credit First Lady (and LIFE magazine favorite) Jacqueline Kennedy, who spoke French fluently and made the request in person to Andre Malraux, the French minister of cultural affairs, during a dinner at the White House. According to Margaret Leslie Davis’s book Mona Lisa in Camelot, Jackie Kennedy wanted the painting to come to America because she “saw the exhibition as an unmatched opportunity to burnish the American image at home and abroad, and [as] a convincing emblem of friendship between France and the U.S. It was a well-chosen gesture of amity, goodwill, and fervent diplomacy.”
The plan to send the Mona Lisa to America was not popular in France, with art experts calling the idea “insane” and “deadly.” They worried that harm would come to this famous and fragile work of art, which was painted in 1503, either because of accidental damage or an act of terror.
French officials did everything they could to make sure Mona Lisa’s journey was a safe one. Here’s how LIFE described the painting’s journey from Paris to Washington in December 1962.
Surrounded by grandeur that would have done credit to Charles de Gaulle, she had travelled on the S.S. France in a deluxe suite that would have cost an ordinary passenger $2,000. Day and night four guards and three museum officials hovered around to check her temperature and see that her wraps didn’t slip off….She was spirited into an air-conditioned van on a New York dock and whisked to the National Gallery in Washington.
The trip from New York to Washington apparently included the van making a stop at a roadside filling station—probably the nearest the Mona Lisa has ever been to a five-cent hot dog. The photo of the van at the filling station is one of many shot by LIFE’s John Loengard, who documented the van journey and of a press viewing in Washington D.C. The painting was exhibited in Washington for three weeks in January 1963, when it was seen by more than a half-million visitors, who waited up to two hours in line for their glimpse of it. Then the painting returned back up to New York, where LIFE’s Ralph Morse took some more photos of the masterpiece on its way to the Met.
After nearly a month in New York, the Mona Lisa returned to France looking no worse for wear.
A French security guard with the crated ‘Mona Lisa’ painting in the state room of a French liner enroute to the US for an exhibit. 1962.
Ralph Morse/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa was transported by van from New York to Washington D.C. during its U.S. visit in 1962.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa was transported by van from New York to Washington D.C. during its U.S. visit in 1962.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
During a visit to New York and Washington D.C.. in 1963, the Mona Lisa made the trip by van, 1962.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa (inside its transport crate) came to the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1962.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa (inside its transport crate) came to the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1962.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The press at the visit of the Mona Lisa to Washington D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A security guard kept its eye on the Mona Lisa during its visit to the National Gallery of Art, 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., 1963.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa, on a goodwill trip from France, arrived in New York City in a protective box, 1963.
Ralph Morse/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa, on a goodwill trip from France, arrived in New York City in a protective box, 1963.
Ralph Morse/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Mona Lisa, on loan from France, hung in a vault at the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C., 1963.
John Leongard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock