It was at his home at Montreat, N.C., that the Rev. Billy Graham, “the father of modern Christian evangelism” and “spiritual advisor” to U.S. Presidents died in 2018 at the age of 99.
In 1955, LIFE photographed him when that 200-acre mountainside home was being built among the Blue Ridge Mountains of western North Carolina, near the farm he grew up on in Charlotte. It was a sacred place for him and only fitting that a man who would preach about God’s presence in nature would recharge in such a place between his crusades worldwide and media appearances.
These photos, most of which were never published in LIFE magazine, show outtakes of the Baptist minister at home. They’re images that Ed Clark had taken for a special issue that came out during the Christmas week that year, at a time when Graham was “the most famous U.S. religious leader,” as the magazine put it. The feature, “Resting Up to Save Souls” (Dec. 26, 1955), showed the “boyish-looking” 37-year-old seeking “seclusion” with his wife Ruth (pictured below, from left) who “knows the Bible better than he does” and children Franklin, Virginia, Anne and Ruth, plus the family dog.
In addition to reading the Bible while relaxing on a hammock, and going on hikes with his family, he played golf with “an unorthodox crosshand grip,” as the magazine observed. Graham told LIFE that the Lord won’t let him play the game well, because if He did, “I’d spend too much time at it.”
Billy Graham in his home office, North Carolina, 1955
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Billy Graham at home in North Carolina, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Rev. Billy Graham beside his swimming pool, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Billy Graham with his wife and daughter, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Billy Graham, his son, Franklin, and his wife, Ruth, in a car, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Billy Graham with his son, Franklin, in 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Rev. Billy Graham and family at a meal, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Ruth Graham, wife of the Rev. Billy Graham, and daughter, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Rev. Billy Graham and family, 1955.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Rev. Billy Graham with his son, Franklin, and the family dog in 1955.
Horses are majestic creatures who have played many roles in American culture. They’re athletes (Seabiscuit), movie stars (National Velvet), military troops, and farm workers—not to mention beloved companions. In one 1952 gimmick, a horse that supposedly possessed clairvoyant powers even composed a headline for a LIFE story about herself. (She was clairvoyant, but not creative: the headline was “Talking Horse.”)
To celebrate horses now and then, here’s a look back at 25 of the most memorable horses in LIFE’s pages.
Polo ponies at the Peachtree Ranch in Texas, 1939.
Carl Mydans The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Championship horse Seabiscuit after winning the Santa Anita Handicap, 1940.
Peter Stackpole The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A doctor listened to a horse’s heart at University of Pennsylvania’s School of Veterinary Medicine, 1940.
Alfred Eisenstaedt The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A Moroccan soldier of the French expeditionary force held the General’s Arabian horse, 1940.
Margaret Bourke-White The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A stallion tried to make friends with a barn cat, 1943.
Hansel Mieth The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A man watched his work horse drink from a water trough, 1944.
Fritz Goro The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Elizabeth Taylor posed with a saddle horse after her smash movie debut in “National Velvet,” 1945.
Peter Stackpole The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
These boys rode their horse to school, 1946.
Bernard Hoffman The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A lucky horse joined the roulette action in Las Vegas, 1947.
Jon Brenneis The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Gene Autry, astride his horse Champion, surveyed his Ranch, 1948.
Loomis Dean The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The foreman of the JA Ranch, Clarence, Hailey Long, sat with his horse, 1949.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Mary Breckenridge ran the Frontier Nursing Service in Leslie Country, Kentucky, 1949.
Eliot Elisofon The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
“Lady Wonder,” a clairvoyant 27 year old talking horse, could count and spell its name by tipping over lettered panels, 1952.
Hank Walker The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
This child could look his miniature horse in the eye, 1952.
Ed Clark The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Baby horses scampered down the stretch at Los Alamitos track, 1952.
George Silk The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The horse sailed gracefully toward its tank in Atlantic City, N.J., 1953.
Peter Stackpole The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Midget thoroughbred filly, Big Bertha, and her mother on Woodland farm, 1954.
Lisa Larsen The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A six-year-old cowboy learned how to shoe a horse, 1954.
Allan Grant The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
This young girl rode her pony as a colt followed, 1956.
Robert W. Kelley The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
“Misty of Chincoteague,” a wild horse, indulged before returning home to Chincoteague Island, 1957.
Grey Villet The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Harness racing at the All-Russia horse show at the Hippodrome, 1958.
Howard Sochurek The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Trader Horn nuzzled a young friend at Roosevelt Raceway, 1959.
Donald Uhrbrock The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Israeli children of the Habad sect at a farm village, 1960.
Paul Schutzer The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A troika race at Hippodrome, 1963.
Stan Wayman The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Jimmy the horse rollerskated in front of his farm, 1963.
Joseph Scherschel The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
As LIFE described the situation to readers in 1948, the Navajo Nation was “a country within a country” a reminder that Native American history courses inextricably alongside everything else that falls under the umbrella of American history.
When photographer Leonard McCombe visited Navajo country in Arizona to create the images in this story, however, he caught a people at a very specific and important point in that long and ongoing history. The Navajo Nation, which comprised about 61,000 members at the time and was the fastest-growing Native American group in the nation, was at a moment of crisis.
By that point in 1948, the land on which the Navajos lived could no longer support them and Americans were hearing reports of starvation on the reservation. However, as LIFE noted, simply sending food wouldn’t solve the problem.
The story focused on the extended Yellowsalt family, most of whom made their living by herding sheep. The family couldn’t get permission from reservation administrators—who pointed to the disappearing grass in the area—to expand the flock. By the government’s calculations, according to LIFE, the land could only support enough sheep for about 20% of the families to own enough of the animals to make a sustainable living. Meanwhile, exposure to white populations had introduced devastating diseases into the Navajo community, and government-run hospitals didn’t have enough beds to support the population.
The central questions posed by the story were inescapable: “How can technical knowledge be made available to people without destroying the fabric of their lives? How can nations which differ from each other in appearance and language and culture live peaceably together?”
“Overall, I was surprised at the general accuracy of the piece,” said David E. Wilkins, a professor of American Indian Studies at the University of Minnesota and an author of The Navajo Political Experience, considering the date and the audience for which it was written. “It was full of the assimilation language that was dominant at the time, but that wasn’t surprising.”
Wilkins has some quibbles with the story. For example, LIFE published images of bare-breasted Navajo women that strike him as strange, as he says he’s not aware of a ceremony in which Navajo women would usually go unadorned. But the big thing that’s missing, he says, is a sense of the larger context in which the Yellowsalt family was living. LIFE hints at the reasons why there aren’t enough sheep for the family to prosper, noting that when the people returned to land they had been forced from in the late 1800s, it was now a reservation “hemmed in by land-hungry whites,” and that grazing flocks on that fenced-in space destroyed the range. “As the Navajo nation grew,” LIFE noted, “the land, the basis of its existence, began to fail.” But as Wilkins points out, it was a federal livestock-reduction program in the 1930s not the natural course of things that had mandated they cut back on grazing animals on that land.
“In 1948, the Navajo Nation was still reeling from the livestock-reduction program,” he says. “It devastated the Navajos economically, psychically and culturally.”
The coming of World War II staved off economic disaster for a little while; Wilkins says that more than 15,000 Navajos were employed in some fashion as a result of the war. But in 1948 the consequences could no longer be denied. “The war’s over and they go back to the reservation and there’s nothing there because of wrong-headed policy makers who thought they were doing the right thing,” he explains. Though those policy-makers thought they saving the land from overgrazing, Wilkins says that in fact later research shows that the Navajo livestock were not a primary cause of the problems. In addition, though federal policy affected every aspect of Navajo life, it was only later in 1948 that the Arizona Supreme Court declared that the state’s Navajo citizens had the right to vote.
The best thing about this article, Wilkins said, is what happened after it was published.
Media attention paid to the crisis among the Navajo People, with popular journalistic reports such as this one, contributed to Congress passing the Navajo-Hopi Long Range Rehabilitation Act, which “helped to save those two peoples from the economically crippled situation they were in.” That, perhaps, is part of the answer to that question: How can two very different nations live peaceably together?
Seated close to the evening fire, old man Gray Mountain, 91, told his small grandchildren legends about the early days of the Navajo people.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A Navajo family living on a reservation.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Toward sunddown the Yellowsalts finished up their outdoor chores and start the fire for their evening meal. In the background is Navajo Mountain.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Yellowsalt’s son had his hair brushed by his wife.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A Navajo woman smoked a hand-rolled cigarette.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A Navajo young man.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
This Navajo woman sported Navajo-crafted silver shirt collar caps, beaded earrings, and a beaded necklace complete with silver quarters and 50 cent pieces strung together like a tie.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Baking bread, a woman knelt by the fire while a loaf cooked on a crude metal grill.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A Navajo girl hugged her dog while she watched the sheep on the high plateau.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
The game of marbles, was explained by the boy at center to his brother and sister. This boy, who went to school, learned the game there.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A Navajo traded at the store on the reservation.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Navajo children received religious instruction.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Navajo children napped on the tables and the floor.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Navajo girls swept the sidewalk.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A young Navajo girl read a Raggedy Ann book.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Navajo schoolchildren got a lesson in nose-blowing from a white teacher.
Leonard McCombe The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Veterans Day, which falls each year on November 11, is a time for Americans to remember the sacrifices made by those who served in the U.S. military. But the first Veterans Day—dedicated to veterans of all wars—also happened to honor a different group of Americans.
On Veterans Day in 1954, one month after President Dwight D. Eisenhower issued the first Veterans Day proclamation and the new holiday officially replaced Armistice Day, a whopping 50,000 men and women from coast to coast were sworn in as new U.S. citizens in what LIFE magazine called “the first time in U.S. history that citizenship was conferred upon so many people in so many mass ceremonies.”
A photo in the Nov. 22, 1954, issue showed three Japanese people getting sworn in on the battleship U.S.S. Missouri in Bremerton, Wash., on the same deck on which the Japanese signed their surrender on Sept. 2, 1945, ending World War II. But many more photos from that day exist in LIFE’s archives, and they provide a unique look at that historic day.
At a ceremony at Brooklyn’s Ebbets Field where 1,600 men and women took the oath of citizenship, U.S. Attorney General Herbert Brownell Jr. acknowledged the renewed significance of the ceremony’s overlap on Veterans Day.
“November 11th is a hallowed day for all Americans,” he said, “And it continues as a day dedicated to memory of the past and hope for the future hope that all men can learn to live together in peace as we have done in this American melting pot of the world.”
He also emphasized that swearing allegiance as a U.S. citizen was more important than ever in 1954, with the Cold War in full swing. In fact, the Cold War had changed the character of the country’s most famous immigration station, Ellis Island, which was put to use in the ’50s to implement a post-WWII policy that banned people who had been affiliated with a totalitarian party.
But as Brownell said in his speech, Ellis Island had been is disuse as an immigrant station, with only a few hundred detained there in recent months, compared to the 1.2 million that Ellis Island had processed in 1907. Immigration services in New York would be moved to a different building, off the island, on Nov. 12, 1954. The day after this historic Veterans Day, Ellis Island closed as an immigration center.
“The island buildings, I feel sure, can be put to useful service in other work,” Brownell said.
In the decades that followed, the immigration center would be reopened as a museum—one that, all these years later, sees even more visitors each year than the number who came through Ellis Island annually at the height of immigration.
Original caption: “In mass induction of 9,000 new citizens, men and women at New York’s Polo Grounds raise their right hands to take oath of allegiance.”
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mass induction of new citizens in New York on Veterans Day, 1954.
Lisa Larsen / The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
They came to Washington, D.C., in the spring of 1968, by the thousand young and old, black and white, traveling in buses and cars and mule trains. Some had left homes in the rural South. Others came from cities like Memphis, Chicago and Los Angeles. Most were African Americans, but Latinos, white, and members of half a dozen Native American nations were on hand as well. Virtually all of them were poor. Although Martin Luther King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) had summoned them to the nation’s capital, the movement belonged to them. This was the Poor People’s Campaign (PPC).
They were often called “the invisible poor.” But they came to Washington determined to be seen and heard by their government and by the nation as a whole. They had answered King’s call because they shared his conviction that the nation’s progress toward racial equality and economic justice had stalled. Indeed, King believed that the nation was in crisis. He pointed to signs that couldn’t be missed millions of citizens of the world’s richest nation living in grinding poverty; violent eruptions of rage and frustration in black inner cities; an immoral war in Southeast Asia that siphoned away resources from anti-poverty programs at home while spreading suffering and death abroad. During the December 1967 press conference at which the SCLC launched the PPC, King told reporters that America was in the grips of “a kind of social insanity.”
King was convinced that a renewed campaign of civil disobedience in his words, “a new kind of Selma or Birmingham” would recalibrate America’s moral compass and force the government to address the needs of the poor. He felt that the campaign’s demands for jobs for every able-bodied worker and for a decent income for the elderly and infirm would receive “a sympathetic understanding across the nation.” King pledged to “lead waves of the nation’s poor and disinherited to Washington.” Once there, what he called “militant nonviolent actions,” such as marches and sit-ins, would “dramatize the economic plight of the Negro, and compel the government to act.”
In New York City, Jill Freedman heard King’s call and she answered. Like King, she sensed that America faced an existential crisis. In a recent interview, she told me that his assassination in April 1968, only weeks before the PPC was scheduled to arrive in Washington, left her devastated and searching for a way to respond. A chance encounter with a campaign organizer in Central Park seemed to supply the answer. Still in her 20s, she quit her job as a copywriter for an advertising agency and left for the nation’s capital with hundreds of others, in what she describes as a “long covered Greyhound wagon train.” Her camera was in her hand. Freedman’s 2017 new book, Resurrection City, 1968, showcase the photographs that she made as a participant in the PPC.
Freedman was far from being a professional photographer. At the time, she was little more than an enthusiastic amateur with a darkroom. She was in love with the art and craft of photography, however, and was especially drawn to the way the photo-essays she saw in LIFE magazine, by photographers such as of W. Eugene Smith, told stories about the quiet heroism of ordinary people. She felt that photographs like Smith’s introduced viewers to people and events and to truths that they might never have otherwise imagined. Photography like this had the potential to change the world, at least in some small way, and Freedman wanted to play her part. By joining the PPC, she committed herself to documenting the campaign that King had called into being.
Resurrection City, the PPC’s plywood and canvas city-within-a-city that took shape on the Mall in the shadow of the Lincoln Memorial, became the visible symbol of the PPC. For the six weeks of its existence, in May and June 1968, it was also Freedman’s home. The encampment was a magnet for photographers. Scores came and went, and some made compelling photographs. But of those photographers only Freedman lived in the city, from beginning to end, and her pictures stand out from all the others.
Most of the photographers who visited camp were looking for kind of dramatic images that readers of newspapers and magazines had come to expect from civil rights campaigns. Clichés were easy to find daily marches to government buildings; periodic confrontations with the police; charismatic leaders, such as a young Jesse Jackson. Visits by Sidney Poitier and other celebrities, and concerts by the likes of jazz trumpeter Dizzy Gillespie, also provided photographers occasions for making photographs that instantly caught the eye.
Freedman sometimes photographed scenes like these. It was important, after all, to document the protests and the police. But those aren’t the photographs at the heart of either the exhibition or the book. Avoiding most of the easy drama and all of the celebrities, she offers instead portraits of ordinary people the women, men and children who were the unheralded heroes of the movement. Freedman’s people are the ones with the muddiest shoes and wettest clothes, the people with the most to gain and most to lose. Her refusal to concentrate on protests and charismatic leaders challenges her viewers. She asks her audience to see the dignity and humanity amid the grime, the anger, and the rain.
Freedman’s photographs of Resurrection City first appeared in the June 28, 1968, issue of LIFE as part of a photo-essay on the PPC (see below). The photographs, five by Freedman and seven by members of the magazine’s staff, focused on the daily lives of the camp’s residents children play, teenagers flirt, an elderly woman plays a guitar, everyone struggles through the mud. An article by staff writer John Neary that accompanied the photo-essay contained some of the most insightful reporting on Resurrection City to appear anywhere. He knew that the women and men who made up the PPC simply wanted their share of the American dream “dignity, a future, a chance for their kids, a modicum of happiness.” He understood knew that the campaigners were in Washington to assert their rights, not to plead for them. They had come to the capital and built their city in order to “demand an end to poverty and violence, to demand a meaningful job for every employable person, and end to hunger and malnutrition that scarred their lives.” Neary admitted that he didn’t know what would become of the people of Resurrection City and their campaign, but he was sure that they intended “never to be invisible again.”
It is now nearly half a century since Freedman made her photographs of the PPC. That may not be forever, but it’s long enough to suggest that her images of the no-longer-invisible poor have become an indelible part of the nation’s historical record.
John Edwin Mason teaches African history and the history of photography at the University of Virginia. He is writing a book on the photographer, writer, and filmmaker Gordon Parks. This piece is adapted from “Seeing Resurrection City, Seeing the Poor,” Mason’s introduction to Freedman’s new book, Resurrection City, 1968.
Resurrection City, Washington D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Washington D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Washington D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Poor Peoples Campaign, Washington, D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Poor Peoples Campaign, Washington, D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Poor Peoples Campaign, Washington, D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Poor Peoples Campaign, Washington, D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
Resurrection City, Poor Peoples Campaign, Washington, D.C., 1968.
Jill Freedman, courtesy of Steven Kasher Gallery
From the June 28, 1968 issue of LIFE magazine.
Page 22 photo by Rowland Scherman. Page 23 photos by Jill Freedman (top) and Leonard McCombe (bottom).
From the June 28, 1968 issue of LIFE magazine.
Page 24 photos by Rowland Sherman (top), Jill Freedman (bottom). Page 25 photos by Jill Freedman (center), Leonard McCombe (right, 2).
From the June 28, 1968 issue of LIFE magazine.
Page 26/27 photo by Rowland Scherman. Page 27 photo by Jill Freedman (top and bottom right), Rowland Scherman (center).
From the June 28, 1968 issue of LIFE magazine.
Page 28 photo by Rowland Scherman. Page 29 photo by Charles Phillips.
When Sputnik 1 launched on Oct. 4, 1957 LIFE Magazine’s audience had to get used to a new reality. In a very literal sense, there was a “dazzling new sight in the heavens,” as the magazine put it, and a Soviet device passed overhead several times a day. Figuratively, things were different too. The world had entered a new age of space exploration and, much to the shock of many in the U.S., it did not begin with American glory.
In an Oct. 21 cover package about the satellite, LIFE looked at the situation from a variety of angles.
An essay from guided-missile expert C.C. Furnas took the U.S. to task for not being the first to launch a satellite, arguing that the feat would have been entirely feasible if the nation had simply buckled down. “All too frequently it has been the view of our defense establishment that research not directly related to the development of military hardware is entitled to only secondary consideration,” he wrote. “It has been regarded as a sort of extracurricular scientific pastime to be indulged in only if money is left over from the ‘really important’ things.” Such an outlook was shortsighted, he explained, especially since many of the century’s most significant military advances had been the accidental result of scientific discovery, not the other way around.
Meanwhile, in the political world, President Eisenhower attempted to reassure Americans by promising that a U.S. satellite would launch, and that it would be even better than Sputnik. And culturally, though afraid of what the news could mean for the Cold War, many Americans showed their Sputnik spunk by embracing satellite-inspired cocktails, toys and clothing, all while looking ahead to the next step in the space race.
It was this can-do attitude, more than anything, that the magazine attempted to summon in an editorial on the subject.
“Sputnik should remind us of what we ourselves have proved many times from Lexington to the Manhattan Project: that any great human accomplishment demands a consecration of will and a concentration of effort,” the magazine proclaimed. “This is as true of the liberation of men and nations as it is of the conquest of space.”
Smithsonian Institution scientists Dr. Josef A. Hynek, Fred L. Whipple and Don Lautman plotted the orbit of Sputnik I.
Dmitri Kessel The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From the Oct. 21, 1957 LIFE magazine cover story.
This globe was built to trace orbit of Sputnik I.
Dmitri Kessel The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
From the Oct. 21, 1957 LIFE magazine cover story.
Using a tracking satellite in a van, scientists from California Institute of Technology measured its radio signal. Silhouetted at the right was a table set up on boxes to hold the men’s supper.
Bill Bridges The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
With fresh data to analyze, scientists at the Minitrack station near Washington let their coffee grow cold.
Paul Schutzer The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
This camera was assembled in California to track Sputnik.
Richard Hartt The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Scientists working at the field lab of the National Bureau of Standards took measurements of Sputnik I signals.
Carl Iwasaki The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Scientists of the National Bureau of Standards Boulder Laboratory listened to signals from Sputnik I.
Carl Iwasaki The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Scientists of the National Bureau of Standards Boulder Laboratory received signals from Sputnik I.
Carl Iwasaki The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
From the Oct. 21, 1957 LIFE magazine cover story.
LIFE Magazine
Space fashions rushed onto the market in 1957 included skirts, jackets, hats, and balloons with a satellite motif.
Peter Stackpole The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Macy’s department store filled the shelves with space toys.
Ted Russell The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Space toys displayed by costumed employees of Macy’s in New York included suits, guns, and balloons.
Ted Russell The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
A young woman ate a Sputnik sundae.
Don Cravens The LIFE Images Collection/Shutterstock
Dr. Sig Hansen wore a 50-pound aluminum and steel space suit in 1957. This room, built by the Air Force and Litton Industries of Beverly Hills, Calif., was a sealed chamber from which virtually all air was pumped out to achieve a vacuum like that encountered in space. During the test, Hansen worked with a radio tube which operated even though the usual vacuum-containing glass shell had been left off, thus permitting easy experimentation with its internal design. At the moment the picture was taken, the chamber was the equivalent of 95.5 miles altitude, the highest vacuum in which a man had yet lived.
J.R. Eyerman The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock