What did that mean, exactly? It meant that these teenage boys, much like their counterparts in more peaceful periods of 20th century America, were chiefly concerned with playing, eating, sleeping, and dating. This was true despite the reality that “The most important fact in the lives of American teenage boys is that they may have to go and fight Japan.”
LIFE elaborated further on what was on the minds of these youngsters:
The old skills are still admired—the ability to swim well, to memorize the names of football heroes, to have a quick wisecrack for the day’s every small event, to be popular. The ancient foibles are still pursued—homework is done in ten minutes. Mother is looked upon as a lovable servant, home is only for eating and sleeping. The greatest talent is an asset for endlessly happy skylarking.
The main way that the war impacted these young men was gas rationing, because it put a crimp in their fascination with cars, although they found ways to get around that. LIFE wrote, “In an almost gasless society, U.S. boys still have their old jalopies. They have found that a half-hour’s fast talking will usually net them an A coupon from dad and that their motors can often be made to run on a kerosene mixture.” The story put forth that the boys clung to their old cars because it helped with another chief interest of teenage boys is Des Moines, which was dating teenage girls in Des Moines.
Three months after this story ran, Japan surrendered, bringing an end to World War II. This meant that these boys were not only staying home but would have plenty of gas in those cars before too long.
Tom Moore, 17, examined the results of his first shave, Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A teenage boy reached for a comb as he checked his reflection, Des Moines, Iowa, 1945
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenage boys attempted to infiltrate what LIFE called “a hen party,” Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenager Richard Burns of Des Moines liked to have a cola and half of a box of Cheez-Its before going to bed, Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenage boys checked out the comic books and magazines at their local drug store, Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenage boys and girls enjoyed milkshakes at the drug store, Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenage boys on a Saturday afternoon in Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Entering through windows was an initiation ritual for a club which called itself “the Molesters,” Des Moines, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A teenage boy in Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A teenager worked on a smashed fender in a garage in Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenaged boys worked on their 1927 Ford Model T in Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Teenage boys in Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
Nina Leen/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A teenage boy received a haircut, Des Moines, Iowa, 1945.
The summer of 2024 will be just like the summer of 1964 in at least one regard, and it has nothing to do with the Olympics or any presidential elections. Once again The Rolling Stones will be touring the United States.
Back in 1964 the Stones embarked on their first U.S. tour, in support of their self-titled debut record. Sixty years later they are, astoundingly, back it at. Will the 2024 U.S. tour be the last for band that has brought satisfaction —and “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction“—to so many? It certainly could be, although at this it seems unwise to ever question the longevity of a band that has been carrying on this long.
Of course, as the photos in this collection show, the band has changed over the years. In early photos from Walter Daran and LIFE staff photographer John Loengard, the band’s lineup includes Brian Jones, a founding member who would dismissed from the band in 1969 and later drown in a swimming pool. Also shown in photos across the band’s eras is Charlie Watts, the elegant drummer who was there from the beginning and died in 2021.
But all these decades later, frontmen Mick Jagger and Keith Richards are still at it, despite both being 80 years old. Their longevity is a rock and roll miracle, when you think about it, surviving as they have in a business that has a way of chewing people up.
In 2024 the Stones released a new album, their first since 2005 and their 31st studio effort overall, called Hackney Diamonds. What else would they do but get out on the road to support it?
The Rolling Stones performed on The Ed Sullivan Show, 1965.
John Loengard The LIFE Picture Collection/Shutterstock
The Rolling Stones perform on a chandelier-filled set on the ‘Ed Sullivan Show,’ May 2, 1965. From left, guitarists Keith Richards and Brian Jones, singer Mick Jagger, bassist Bill Wyman, and drummer Charlie Watts.
John Loengard/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Drummer Charlie Watts during a Rolling Stones performance at the Forest Hills Tennis Stadium in New York, 1966.
Walter Daran/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Brian Jones during a Rolling Stones performance at the Forest Hills Tennis Stadium in New York, 1966.
Walter Daran/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mick Jagger performed during a 1966 Rolling Stones concert.
Walter Daran/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mick Jagger and The Rolling Stones performed at Live Aid concert in Philadelphia, 1985.
DMI
Mick Jagger and Tina Turner performed together at Live Aid in Philadelphia, 1985.
DMI
The Rolling Stones in concert: Ronnie Wood, Mick Jagger, Charlie Watts, Keith Richards and Bill Wyman.
DMI
Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones performed in 1989.
DMI
Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.
DMI
Mick Jagger during the Rolling Stones’ ‘Voodoo Lounge’ tour, 1994.
DMI
Mick Jagger performed during The Rolling Stones’ 1994 “Voodoo Lounge” tour.
DMI
Keith Richards took center stage during the Rolling Stones’ ‘Voodoo Lounge’ tour, 1994.
DMI
Keith Richards during the 1994 “Voodoo Lounge” tour, 1994.
DMI
Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones during band’s ‘Voodoo Lounge’ tour, 1994.
However odd it seems today to speak of television as a “great development in radio,” LIFE was dead-on in assessing how big a deal the combination of sound and moving pictures would be:
Within the first postwar decade television will be firmly planted as a billion-dollar U.S. industry. Its impact on U.S. civilization is beyond present prediction. Television is more than the addition to sight to the sound of radio. It has a power to annihilate time and space that will unite everyone everywhere in the immediate experience of events in contemporary life and history.
After getting readers excited about the new technology, the story then went on to detail its mechanics. The photos by Andreas Feininger are beautiful and fascinating in the way they contrast the machinery of the tubes and plates with the resulting image they produce of a female model whose presence is a kind of siren song. All that glass and metal, dear reader, will magically bring this woman into your living room.
At the time this LIFE story ran, very few Americans owned television sets. In 1946, the first year the government has data for television ownership, the total number of sets in American households was 8,000. By 1951, though, the number had ballooned to more than 10 million.
The LIFE story correctly predicted that TV would give Americans the new power to witness history live, and that was transformative. Part of the immense power of the signature moments of the original run of LIFE magazine—whether it be triumphs such as the moon landing or tragedies like the assassination of John F. Kennedy—was that Americans experienced those moments together, huddled around their televisions, seeing the same things at the same time.
The lens, at right, focused its image onto a plate in an RCA television camera tube, 1944.
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
This “dissector camera tube” was part of a 1944 story in LIFE on the brand new technology of television. Here’s how the magazine described the tube’s function: “Image is focussed on light-sensitive plate (left). Electrical field transforms visible image into extended electronic image…Electromagnetic field pulls this extended image back and forth in front of scanning finger mounted vertically at front of tube.”
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A Schmidt projector threw this image of a model onto a screen. A 1944 article in LIFE on the new TV technology stated that “projection screens will be part of postwar home receivers.”
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A 1944 LIFE story on how television worked showed an image of girl being focused through a lens, 1944.
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A color television camera, 1944.
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
An image from LIFE’s look at the technical side of the emerging technology known as television, 1944.
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
In a 1944 story about emerging television technology, this demonstration photo illustrated how lines came together to make a picture.
Andreas Feininger/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
LIFE was quite the fan of Austrian actress Senta Berger, at least judging by the coverage it offered when she began making movies in the United States. The magazine introduced her to the American public in a 1965 story headlined “She’s Paulette, Hedy and Ava, All in One.”
For those not on a first-name basis with those leading ladies of the early days of cinema, the article filled in the details:
“When people look at Senta Berger, they see more than just an astonishingly pretty young woman. They see images of other famous beauties—a hint of Paulette Godard, a flicker of Hedy Lamarr, quite a lot of Ava Gardner—or whomever they remember as being dark and altogether wonderful.”
LIFE magazine photographer Bill Ray caught up with Berger when she was down in Mexico filming Major Dundee, which was directed by the legendary Sam Peckinpah. The movie starred Charlton Heston as the title character, who leads a military expedition in Mexico during America’s Civil War. Berger played a Mexican woman who has a romance with the Heston character. Major Dundee flopped in its day but has gained respect over the years, thanks in part to the release of a restored version which was closer to Peckinpah’s vision. The film now has a 97 percent fresh score on the review aggregation site Rotten Tomatoes.
Ray captured Berger on the set of Major Dundee and also posing in a swimsuit and in the nude. It’s not difficult to see why the editors were gushing about Berger.
Even though Major Dundee wasn’t appreciated in its time, Berger’s career rolled on. In 1966 alone she appeared in six movies, and she would stayed busy for years, acting in film and television in productions on both sides of the Atlantic. The most recent of her 171 IMDB credits came in 2023, when she starred in the German romantic comedy Weisst du Nocht.
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Senta Berger and Charlton Heston relax between scenes during the filming of ‘Major Dundee,’ directed by Sam Peckinpah, Mexico, April 1964.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Director Sam Peckinpah the filming of “Major Dundee” in Mexico, 1964.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Senta Berger and Charlton Heston during the filming of ‘Major Dundee,’ directed by Sam Peckinpah, Mexico, April 1964.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Charlton Heston and Senta Berger kiss by the water’s edge in a scene from the film ‘Major Dundee,’ directed by Sam Peckinpah, Mexico, April 1964.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee.”
Bill Ray/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Austrian actress Senta Berger during the time she was shooting the 1965 film “Major Dundee” in Mexico.
Two rangers quietly sat on a platform 25 feet up in a tree with a large pile of bananas and red buckets filled with milk. As I watched, a dozen orangutans quickly climbed and swung over to grab the fruit and stick their heads in the buckets for a drink. The orange-haired apes then lounged around, undisturbed by the humans alongside them.
Half a mile further into Borneo’s Kabili-Sepilok rainforest it was much less hectic. The air felt humid. I could smell the earth and hear the droning sound of cicadas filling the forest as I avoided the leeches dropping from above. Up ahead I spied another feeding platform. The rangers there sat alone as they scanned the trees but saw no signs of orangutans eager to eat. One of the men bellowed out an apelike long call to announce their presence. Soon a single female with an infant gripping its fur lowered from the canopy above. She snatched some fruit and quickly disappeared back into the jungle.
The Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre near Sandakan, Malaysia, serves as a temporary home for the apes. Infants rescued from habitats destroyed by logging and orphans whose mothers have been killed by poachers are treated and cared for, their beseeching hands reaching out to anyone who enters the nursery. “It’s difficult when the orangutans come in very young,” Reynard Gondipon, the center’s veterinarian, told me as he showed me through the facility. “I urge the rangers to hug them every now and then.” As they grow, the orangutans are moved out onto the grounds of the 9,000-acre center. There these naturally solitary creatures live alongside others as they learn the lore of forest life: how to climb, build nests, search for food, survive. Slowly, like the mother and child who disappeared into the canopy, they embrace the wilds. Once it is determined that they can fend for themselves, Sepilok’s staff transport them into the forest far away from humanity.
I have long been fascinated by our closest living relatives and our linked ancient ancestry. In the early 1980s I was thrilled to hear presentations by all three of the primatologists known as the Trimates—Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey, and Biruté Galdikas—when they were in New York to discuss their studies of chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. I recall Fossey mentioning a visit to the American Museum of Natural History’s Akeley Hall of African Mammals. While there, she stopped in front of the mountain gorilla diorama. The creatures behind the plate glass had been shot in 1921 by naturalist Carl Akeley during an expedition he led for the museum. Akeley soon after convinced the Belgian government—which controlled the land where those gorillas once lived—to create a national park to protect the apes. Fossey spoke of how she mourned the taxidermic creatures forever frozen in the case yet appreciated Akeley’s and the museum’s efforts to study and save those still in the wild. Of course, Fossey would die only a few years later as she herself fought to protect gorillas in the remote rainforests of Rwanda’s Virunga mountains.
The work Fossey, Galdikas, and Goodall dedicated their lives to is not for the faint of heart. Galdikas recently described to me the hardships she endured studying Borneo’s orangutans: “You are sitting in the swamp. It is so primeval. You couldn’t stand the buzzing of the mosquitos, the buzzing of the other insects, the horseflies that bite you. They really hurt, just a sharp hurt. And of course, the leeches.” But she also experienced true joy observing the magnificent animals, recalling how on Christmas Day 1971 at the start of her time doing her research she watched a mother and its child emerge from its tree nest. Galdikas called the sight “the best Christmas present.”
Humans and the great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) and smaller apes (gibbons) share a common past. Our species diverged millions of years ago and evolved. Earth’s human population was about 1 million in 10,000 BCE, and 3 billion when Goodall arrived in Tanzania in 1960. There are now 8 billion people on earth. While the human population has exploded, that is not the case for apes. In 1900 there were more than 1 million chimpanzees in the wild. At most, a third of that number now exist. Orangutans have dropped from 300,000 to roughly 100,000.
Many more will perish, as the human population is expected to reach 10 billion by 2100. Apes’ numbers have been decimated, as they lose their habitats to deforestation and their lives to poachers. While there are laws to protect these species, trafficking is highly profitable. Each year, thousands of young apes are captured, with baby gorillas being offered for more than half a million dollars on social media sites like WhatsApp.
There are, though, hopeful signs for some ape populations as they and their habitats are being protected. The mountain gorillas in Uganda’s Bwindi Impenetrable Forest have seen their numbers increase from 254 in 1981 to more than 1,000 today, due to intense conservation practices and ecotourism.
To preserve their habitats, governments and organizations have trained locals to manage the forests. This creates jobs and encourages communities to protect what they have. The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund has trackers who monitor daily the largest of the apes where Fossey set up camp back in 1967. “These guys are the front line of conservation,” says Tara Stoinski, president of the fund. “They are the reason that these animals are still on the planet. These mountains are cold, they’re wet, and they are tracking up to 13,000 feet 365 days a year. They are true conservation heroes.”
Galdikas’ Camp Leakey and her Orangutan Care Center and Quarantine facility in the Indonesian village of Pasir Panjang 700 miles southwest of Sandakan similarly cares for and rewilds apes. And the new 117,000 acre Ekolo ya Bonobo, created by Claudine André in rainforests in the northwest of the Democratic Republic of Congo, has become home to freed bonobos. There are fewer than 2,500 Javan silvery gibbons left in the wild, and the Aspinall Foundation in conjunction with the Indonesian government has successfully reintroduced two dozen into protected areas.
Such work is an uphill and often dangerous battle. Legions of researchers, scientists, and volunteers have devoted their lives to watching over, studying, and protecting our magnificent relatives. As the great primatologist George Schaller wrote of the gorillas in National Geographic in 1995, which holds true for all the great and smaller apes, “We have a common past, but only humans have been given the mental power to worry about their fate.”
Nick Ledger/Alamy; (background) Gudkov Andrey/Shutterstock
A chimpanzee mother and her baby at the Conkouati-Douli National Park in the Republic of Congo.
Gudkov Andrey/Shutterstock
As it is with human children, chimpanzees like to have fun. Playtime is an important developmental activity and can lead to breathy laughter. Three-year-old Gizmo and his 8-year-old brother Gimli enjoyed a bit of roughhousing at Tanzania’s Gombe Stream National Park.
Anup Shah/Stone/Getty
The bonobo is often mistaken for a chimpanzee, but it smaller and slimmer.
Gudkov Andrey/Shutterstock
Gorillas are the largest living primates.
P. Wegner/imageBROKER/Shutterstock
Orangutans like these have the most intense mother-child relationship of any primate besides humans.
Freder/E+/Getty
The Siamang Gibbon makes sounds that can be heard two miles away.
Steve Clancy Photography/Moment/Getty
A lar gibbon and its child swing through the forest canopy.
Ever since Garfield swaggered onto the pages of 41 American newspapers on June 19, 1978, the rotund feline famous for his love of lasagna, naps, and sarcastic asides has occupied a special place in the cultural consciousness. Lazy, self-centered, and an unrepentant grump, the cat turned out to possess enough deadpan charm to entertain generations of audiences. Trends might come and go, but Garfield is no fad—in fact, he’ll be back on the big screen in 2024’s animated feature The Garfield Movie, voiced by none other than Chris Pratt.
The character has enjoyed a remarkable run, says creator Jim Davis, precisely because he’s both reliable and relatable, routinely expressing familiar feelings and frustrations. After all, who among us hasn’t wanted to eat pasta and nap all day? And does anyone actually like Mondays?
“I hold a mirror to the reader and show them [their lives] back with a humorous twist, that’s all,” Davis says. “We’re made to feel guilty for overeating, not exercising, and over-sleeping. Garfield relieves our guilt by enjoying all of those things. More often than not, when someone laughs at a Garfield gag, it’s because they’re thinking, ‘Isn’t that true?!’”
In an age when attaining a satisfying work-life balance seems virtually impossible, and at a time when everyone is constantly asked to do more, achieve more, be better or risk feeling less than, Garfield serves as a potent reminder that some days, the healthier option is just going back to bed. The furry protagonist was clearly ahead of his time when it came to the idea of self-care.
But Garfield was also very much a creature of the 1980s—maybe the creature of the 1980s, a decade that celebrated conspicuous consumption in all its myriad forms and transformed the character into an A-list superstar. During the “greed is good” era, Davis’s comic-strip cat could be found not only in daily newspapers around the globe—when daily newspapers were a thriving concern and most households were subscribers—but also on the New York Times best-seller list, the cover of People magazine, and as a balloon in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.
That’s in addition to headlining his own Emmy-winning animated TV specials and a Saturday morning cartoon, Garfield and Friends, not to mention the onslaught of merchandise featuring the feline. T-shirts, posters, coffee mugs—you name it, Garfield was on it. At the height of the Garfield craze, people simply couldn’t get enough of the obnoxious yet imminently lovable cat.
“Garfield was all over the place,” says Robert J. Thompson, professor of popular culture at Syracuse University. “It was a user-friendly comic strip, which means not a whole lot of words and plenty of white space in between. And if you missed [Garfield] in the paper, you saw [him] in the licensing products and in the back windows of people’s cars or the TV specials. … Garfield was pretty much everywhere.”
Although no one could have anticipated just how successful Garfield would become, Davis had high hopes for how the cat might fare. He designed Garfield to appeal to the widest possible audience. In dreaming up the chubby character, Davis studied comic strips that were popular in the late 1970s and took notes. He’d noticed numerous high-profile offerings centering on dogs, most obviously Peanuts, with its anarchic beagle hero Snoopy. So he chose to create something for the world’s many cat lovers, taking inspiration from the felines who lived on his parents’ farm in Fairmount, Indiana.
“I pulled Garfield a little bit from several cats I knew, but more from the fat housecats that lived with my grandparents and friends—cats who had their own chair,” Davis told Entertainment Weekly in 2014. “It was the indoor cats that most influenced [Garfield]. He was also influenced by a lot of people. Basically, Garfield is a human in a cat suit. He exists in a cat’s body and moves like a cat and does many cat-like things, but really his basic personality is hopefully a lot like we all are, way down deep, with just our basic animal urges.”
To flesh out the strip, Davis developed characters—nerdy owner Jon Arbuckle, clueless dog Odie, obnoxious fellow feline Nermal—who could serve as foils for Garfield. As he explained to EW: “Jon has my eternal optimism. That’s me. I’m the guy whose glass is half full, always looking on the bright side of things. He’s a daydreamer, easygoing, puffy cheeks. I have that. … As Garfield is bright and cunning, Odie is not so bright, very accepting. Odie is a free spirit. It’s in the contrasts and the conflicts in the characters that humor is derived. If everybody looked alike and got along, there would be no humor.”
Additionally, Davis decided to omit timely political and cultural references. Garfield exists in a space where years don’t pass, characters don’t age, and no one ever argues about current events. “If you were to mention the football strike, you’re going to be excluding everyone else in the world that doesn’t watch pro football,” Davis explained to the Washington Post in 1982.
Although critics sometimes groused that the cartoonist played things too safe, the public loved Garfield, and once it took off, Davis almost never wavered from his gag-a-day approach. The comic strip’s visual style was simple, the humor grounded in universally relatable day-to-day experiences, all the better to translate for international audiences. “I don’t use any proper names, I try to use as few colloquialisms as possible, and about the only sport I recognize is golf, which is easily translatable,” Davis told the National Post in 2007. “[If] I have to do a gag that’s based on something I know will be difficult to translate, I always encourage the translators to capture the essence of the gag, the spirit of the gag, and write it for their own vernacular. In fact, for a while, Garfield loved sushi in Japan. Until Italian restaurants opened up and they knew what lasagna was.”
Garfield-mania did abate somewhat as the 1990s gave way to the 21st century, but the character never vanished from view. In 2002, Garfield was named the globe’s most widely syndicated comic strip by the Guinness Book of World Records. It made the leap to the big screen in 2004 with Garfield: The Movie, followed two years later by a sequel, Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties. An animated series called The Garfield Show subsequently premiered in America in 2009.
Garfield-branded merchandise continued to be big business—in 2018, the Guardian reported that the character brought in an estimated $750 million to $1 billion annually worldwide.
“I say this all the time: Everyone is a fan of something, and they want their fandom to tell the story of who they are,” says Amanda Cioletti, vice president of content and strategy for Informa Markets’ global licensing group. “Engagement with licensed properties can reflect identity and self-expression for audiences. Garfield speaks to many with his frank, no-holds-barred, lasagna-loving self. He’s got a timeless, gruff charm that resonates, no matter the decade.”
Although Davis sold the rights to Garfield to Viacom in 2019, he continues to play a hands-on role in the creation of the comic strip, ensuring that the characters and humor remain true to its essence. “I work in the same way with the same folks that I have for the last 35 years or so,” Davis says. “I write gags, and a couple of other people submit writing that I edit for use. I have long-time assistants who work on the drawing, inking, and coloring of the strip. I approve, sign, and date each strip before it goes out.”
The fact that Davis remains so invested in his signature creation sets Garfield apart from some other long-running comic strips that have been passed on to other artists, often to their detriment, says Mike Peterson, who authors the Comic Strip of the Day feature for website Daily Cartoonist: “You get a lot of ‘zombie strips,’ which are strips that have been taken over. The original artists have been dead for 50 years, but the strip goes on. They’re not very imaginative. They’re not very interesting. But Garfield is still being produced. I realize Jim Davis [is] not sitting in a garage someplace scratching that out on Bristol board, but it’s still a fresh strip every day. It’s a new piece.”
That freshness is vital in attracting new readers to Garfield, though, given the precipitous decline in print newspaper circulation, fans young and old have long since begun keeping up with the cat in other media. Davis’s strips can be found online, on such sites as GoComics, and in 2023, Random House published the 75th Garfield book, Garfield Fully Caffeinated. Meanwhile, other creators are penning adventures for the character—people like Judd Winick, the New York Times best-selling creator of Hilo, who grew up on Davis’s comic strips.
Winick told the website Comic Book Resources that it was a dream come true to be invited to contribute a short to BOOM! Studios’ 2017 graphic novel Garfield: Unreality TV, as he’d loved Garfield since childhood. “When I was 9 or so, it first started to run in my local paper,” Winick told Comic Book Resources. “It was around the same time that the second Garfield collection came out, Garfield Gains Weight. I was just nuts for it. I can’t tell you exactly what it was, but when I was little, I just thought it was so damn funny. Maybe it was because Garfield is so mean, maybe because it was kind of slapsticky, but it just hit me in the right sweet spot back then.”
It’s easy to forget just how revolutionary the notion of Garfield as a kind of lovable antihero was back when the cat first exploded onto the scene, Thompson notes. A protagonist who proudly embraces his flaws—who is, in fact, defined by them—felt entirely new and delightfully subversive. “We were just beginning to see those kinds of characters in the culture,” Thompson says. “Now, of course, it’s commonplace to have non-heroic [protagonists], from Mad Men to Breaking Bad to The Sopranos. They’re all [series about] antiheroes.
“But Garfield was coming out when that was still relatively new, and there was something appealing about his unapologetic, cynical, sarcastic, lazy, hedonistic, apathetic personality,” Thompson continues. “We had all certainly known cats like that, but we also recognized humans like that. In fact, I think a lot of us recognize portions of ourselves in [Garfield]. If we had someone else feeding us and providing a roof over our head like Garfield did, we would probably be happy to lie around all day, dreaming of lasagna and complaining about Mondays.”
And even though the sassy cat, who celebrated his 45th birthday in 2023, has entered middle age, he remains as witty and wily (and hungry) as he’s always been. Times may change, Davis notes, but Garfield remains the same. “Whether we read the comics over breakfast or after school or work each day, comic strips and their characters become a part of our lives,” Davis says. “They entertain us and make us feel a little better every single day. We can count on the comics. In a world where life is changing almost daily, Garfield still loves lasagna and hates Mondays.”
In The Garfield Movie (2024), Chris Pratt voices the title character, while Nicholas Hoult plays pal Jon Arbuckle and Harvey Guillén is Odie.
Courtesy of DNEG Animation
The Garfield Movie (2024) has one scene in which the cat is literally living large, much to the consternation of Odie.
Courtesy of DNEG Animation
A still from the 2006 movie Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties, which mixed animation and live action and had Bill Murray voicing the title character.
Photo by 20th Century Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock
Garfield creator Jim Davis showed a drawing of Odie to the dog who played Odie in Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties (2006).
Gemma La Mana/20th Century Fox/Kobal/Shutterstock
Garfield creator Jim Davis posed with Cathy Kothe in her Long Island home in 2014, Kothe holds the Guinness record for the largest collection of Garfield memorabilia, with more than 6,000 objects.
Courtesy of Cathy and Robery Kothe
For more than 30 years, plastic Garfield phones like this one had been mysteriously washing up on French beaches; the riddle was solved when a shipping container full of them that had been lost during a storm was found in a sea cave.